UK Supreme Court decision re sexual orientation discrimination and pension rights - Walker v Innospec Ltd and others [SupCrt EW] 12.07.17
Employment - Pension entitlement - Sexual orientation discrimination - Whether male employee is entitled to require a pension fund to pay a surviving spouse’s pension to his civil partner or husband on the same basis that such a pension would be payable if he were married to a woman. HELD employee's appeal allowed. Paragraph 18 of Schedule 9 to the Equality Act 2010 is incompatible with EU law and must be disapplied. The employee's husband is entitled on his death to a spouse’s pension, provided they remain married.Equalities Act clause struck down as pensioner wins gay marriage appeal (Journal Online 12.07.17)
Link to judgment
Supreme Court press summary
Man wins equal pension rights for husband at supreme court (Guardian 12.07.17)
Category: Employment » Part-time workers; Sexual orientation discrimination; Pensions. Area(s) of law: Employment; Public Sector; Pensions.
Source:  UKSC 47; Times 25.07.17.